By now most people with even a cursory
knowledge of the horticulture know that it's not the best paid
industry around, and this is mostly because the funding simply isn't
there to pay more, in addition to organisations having the mentality
that garden staff are somehow second rate employees (a fact
reflected in wages between different parts of an organisation). The
nation's gardens and parks are being tended by an ever dwindling
number of employed gardeners, partly as a result of technology making
it possible for one person to jobs more efficiently (such as large
lawn mowers speeding up the task of mowing big lawns), but also
because various financial problems have meant that staff have had to
be cut.
The gap between the amount of work to
be done and the number of gardeners available to do it is
increasingly being plugged by an army of volunteers. These people
give their time and energy to helping garden staff to maintain and
develop gardens across the UK. Over the years many gardens,
especially those run by the National Trust, the RHS and other
organisations, have come to rely increasingly on goodwill, but is
this willingness to take part and get stuck in actually endangering
gardens?
Volunteers are vital in large gardens, but for good reasons? |
I've heard rants too; one RHS gardener
(who again won't be named) got really annoyed that the gardeners
increasingly felt that their role in the garden was just
'babysitting' volunteers, some of whom were incredibly able (and
sometimes had to be stopped from going too far!) while others seemed
to be volunteering simply as a way to pass the time and managed to
cause more work than they were doing. Some volunteers were raring to
go, while others wanted to doss around all day, but both required the
supervision of a gardener.
Even the RHS relies heavily on volunteers to maintain gardens. |
The people who sign up to become
volunteers may be incredibly skilled and experienced gardeners or
they might have never picked up a spade in their lives, they might be
hard workers or lazy, they might be responsible or a liability...
this list could go on. The problem is that until they've worked with
a head gardener and a gardening team who can assess their skills and
weaknesses properly they really should be monitored/supervised, tying
down gardeners who should be gardening! I have over the years met
some absolutely incredible volunteers, people with passion, skill and
expertise who are a real asset to a garden, but I've also heard
enough horror stories to know that some cause real headaches. I've
heard blazing rows between volunteers who want to do a particular job
and head gardeners who have other ideas, I've seen volunteers do bad
jobs of things because they've lacked proper guidance and support,
and several years ago I was even told by a volunteer at one National
Trust property that the gardening staff there were all idiots and
that if they had any sense they'd strip the herbaceous borders and
turn them to bedding because that's what 'proper' gardeners do (I let
him finish before I told him that the head gardener at that property
was a good friend of mine)! These people cause grief while others
become real assets to a garden and those employed to look after it,
but when someone volunteers at a garden it's a real lucky dip as to
what that person will be like, and all to often getting rid of 'bad'
volunteers can prove difficult.
Volunteers can work in some great gardens! |