It's easy to imagine some raised
eyebrows when the RHS considered publishing an encyclopaedia of
conifers; conifers have been out of fashion in the UK since the
1980s, so it would stand that any book about them, let alone a two
volume set, wouldn't have the potential to be a best seller.
Thankfully the RHS, along with Kingsblue Publishing, saw the
importance of giving this unloved but diverse group its due, and the
result is spectacular.
The RHS Encyclopaedia Of Conifers is a
two volume set, 1506 pages in total, covering all 615 currently
recognised conifer species and describing an impressive 8,000
cultivars. The set is lavishly illustrated with over 5,000 pictures,
many of which were taken specifically for this encyclopaedia. Given
the widely held view that conifers are “all the same” you could
be forgiven for expecting page after page of nearly identical
pictures or nearly identical plants, but you would be wrong; the
pictures have been chosen and arranged in such a way that each page
shows the diversity of cultivars, and even where the cultivars of a
species can be fairly similar (as with some species of Abies, Picea
and Pinus) the pictures may highlight a different characteristic such
as needle shape or cone. This is hard to explain, so let me give you
an example: within Abies koreana ('Korean Fir') there are a group
named for the silvering of their needles, but rather than show
photographs of each cultivar with its silver needles the publisher
has chosen to focus on the habit of the illustrated cultivars while
showing in a few spectacular images what the effect of the colouring
is. This certainly cuts down on repetition in the pictures, as does
the careful choice of cultivars illustrated at all. Some of the full
page pictures used to punctuate these books are breathtaking!
Just one image of so many |
The descriptions are concise but not
without charm; each described cultivar is briefly covered, explaining
habit, colouring (where necessary), origins and distinguishing
features, but [crucially] also giving an expected height and spread
in 10 years. Conifer growth rates can vary wildly according to
climate, and my dwarf conifers grow much more quickly here in mild
Cornwall than they do in drier and colder areas, but an idea of the
height and spread is still very useful. So far I've not come across
any ultimate heights and spreads in the cultivars, but such details
are given in the descriptions of the individual species. Many of the
ultimate heights given in horticultural books are nothing more than
educated guesswork so the growth after 10 years is of more use to a
gardener than a guessed figure, especially given that many dwarf
conifers (take for example the tiny cultivars of Abies koreana)
originate from much faster and larger growing trees, while some other
cultivars (such as Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 'Little Spire') can grow
considerably larger than expected! The species are covered in more
depth than the cultivars, but descriptions stay away from being
overly botanical. Species are described concisely, but also some
interesting information is given about their habitats and
preferences, their use as timber crops, and in some cases their
relevance to local culture.
The RHS Encyclopaedia Of Conifers has
been a labour of love for its authors, Aris Auders and Derek Spicer.
I don't know much about Mr Auders, except that he was considered a
leading expert on conifers and sadly passed away before this
encyclopaedia was published. I have had the pleasure of meeting Derek
Spicer on several occasions (he owns a conifer wholesale nursery,
Kilworth Conifers, here in the UK), and I can personally vouch for
his love of conifers; his enthusiasm for them, despite their fall
from fashion, comes across in conversation. Derek has introduced
several cultivars into cultivation, including the awesome Podocarpus
'Kilworth Cream', a beautifully variegated shrubby Podocarpus with a
nice bushy habit (I would strongly recommend gardeners get to grips
with Podocarpus, many are useful shrubs for colour and shape).
There can be no doubt that this work
will remain unbeaten for many years to come. The sheer scale of the
work, as well as the care taken to produce an encyclopaedia of such
immense quality, makes this the definitive work for anyone who needs
a broad understanding of conifer species and cultivars. My only
criticism of this work is that it would be nice to have some pictures
of the really rare and obscure genera that appear, if only for the
sake of completion. Even a good picture of a pressed specimen in a
botanical collection would be interesting, but at least by giving
obscure taxa such as Retrophyllum a decent write-up anyone interested
in learning more can go online for more information. This is a very
minor fault with an otherwise perfect encyclopaedia.
Sadly I don't think the publication of
the RHS Encyclopaedia Of Conifers has made, or will ever make, a
difference to how ordinary gardeners perceive conifers. To change
perception will need a radical overhaul of how gardeners value
plants, and while herbaceous plants and growing food remain dominant
trends the poor conifer is shunned. It's a shame really; to shun
conifers is to ignore an enormous family of plants purely based on
their methods of reproduction. Nonetheless this is where we are for
now, and conifers will remain the interest of a minority of more
experienced gardeners. For those gardeners, the RHS Encyclopaedia Of
Conifers is a must-have book, and in addition to being a reference
source it will also bring hours of pleasure just flicking through the
pages. Will there be a second edition? Probably not.
No comments:
Post a Comment